The
term “renaissance” and humanism which are often applied to the same movement
have properly narrower significance. The term “renaissance” though used by many
writers to denote the whose transition from the Middle Ages to the Modern
World, is more correctly applied to the Revival of Art resulting from the
discovery and imitation of classic models in the 14th and 15th c.
Humanism
applied to the Revival of Classical literature, and was so called b its
leaders, following the example Pertrarch, because they held that the study of
the classic “Litrae Humaniore” that is more human writings rather than the old
theology was the best means of promoting the largest human interest. It was in
the 16th century the word “Humanist” was going to signify one taught and worked
in the “studia Humanitiates” that is grammar, rhetoric, history, poetry and
moral philosophy.; and distinguished form fields less concerned with the moral
and imaginative aspects and activities of man, such as mathematics, natural
philosophy and theology. Scholarly, humanists devoted themselves to the
rediscovery and intense study of first roman and then Greek literature and
culture, in particular the works of Cicero, Aristotle and Plato.
Humanists
recovered edited, and expounded many ancient texts in Latin and Greeks and so
contributed greatly to the store of materials and idea of the European
Renaissance. Out of this, intellectual ferment there emerged a view of man and
a philosophy quite different from medieval scholasticism in 19th c. this strand
of Renaissance through was labeled humanism. Reason, balance and a proper
dignity for man were the central ideals of humanists thought. Many humanists
also stressed the need for a rounded development of men’s diverse powers,
physical and mental, artistic and moral as opposed to merely technical or
specialized training. Matthew Arnold opponent of humanism in the Victorian
Period strongly defended the predominance of human studies in general
education.
No comments:
Post a Comment