In 1934, Henry Miller, then aged
forty-two and living in Paris, published his first book. In 1961 the book was
finally published in his native land, where it promptly became a best-seller
and a cause célèbre. By now the waters have been so muddied by controversy
about censorship, pornography, and obscenity that one is likely to talk about
anything but the book itself.
But this is nothing new. Like D. H. Lawrence, Henry
Miller has long been a byword and a legend. Championed by critics and artists,
venerated by pilgrims, emulated by beatniks, he is above everything else a
culture hero—or villain, to those who see him as a menace to law and order. He
might even be described as a folk hero: hobo, prophet, and exile, the Brooklyn
boy who went to Paris when everyone else was going home, the starving bohemian
enduring the plight of the creative artist in America, and in latter years the
sage of Big Sur.
His
life is all written out in a series of picaresque narratives in the
first-person historical present: his early Brooklyn years in Black Spring, his struggles to find himself during the twenties
in Tropic
of Capricorn and the three volumes of the Rosy Crucifixion, his adventures in Paris during the thirties inTropic of Cancer.
In
1939 he went to Greece to visit Lawrence Durrell; his sojourn there provides
the narrative basis ofThe
Colossus of Maroussi. Cut off by the war and forced to
return to America, he made the yearlong odyssey recorded in The Air-Conditioned Nightmare. Then in 1944 he settled on a magnificent empty
stretch of California coast, leading the life described in Big Sur and the Oranges of
Hieronymus Bosch.Now that his name has made Big Sur a
center for pilgrimage, he has been driven out and is once again on the move.
At
seventy Henry Miller looks rather like a Buddhist monk who has swallowed a
canary. He immediately impresses one as a warm and humorous human being.
Despite his bald head with its halo of white hair, there is nothing old about
him. His figure, surprisingly slight, is that of a young man; all his gestures
and movements are young.
His
voice is quite magically captivating, a mellow, resonant but quiet bass with
great range and variety of modulation; he cannot be as unconscious as he seems
of its musical spell. He speaks a modified Brooklynese frequently punctuated by
such rhetorical pauses as “Don’t you see?” and “You know?” and trailing off
with a series of diminishing reflective noises, “Yas, yas . . . hmm . . . hmm .
. . yas . . . hm . . . hm.” To get the full flavor and honesty of the man, one
must hear the recordings of that voice.
The interview was conducted in
September 1961, in London.
No comments:
Post a Comment