In 1836, Charles Dickens, aged 24, married
Catherine Hogarth. It was a rare venture for him into the south-west of the
city – though Chelsea was effectively a village suburb in those days – as
Dickens was resolutely a north London man, his "manor" running from
Somers Town and Camden south to the City, down to the Strand and Waterloo
bridge, taking in Marylebone and Covent Garden. In later life, the northern
edge of Hyde Park was about as far west as he would venture and once, when he
rented a house on the south side of the park in Knightsbridge, he felt
decidedly uncomfortable. The year 1836 was also significant for another reason:
Dickens not only married but he began to be rich. He was writing for four
publishers and that year earned a bonus of £500 for The Pickwick
Papers. Three years earlier, as a journalist, he had been producing
sketches of urban life for a magazine called The Monthly, unpaid.
Dickens lived well – in his pomp, he calculated that he needed around
£9,000 a year (£630,000) to provide for his extended family and dependents, and
to keep him in the style he was accustomed to. Among one of the last things he
did before he died was carry out an inventory of his extensive cellars at his
big house, Gad's Hill, in Kent, noting entries for sherry, brandy, rum and one
"cask very fine Scotch whisky, 30 gallons". Dickens, in addition, was
a heavy drinker, though probably not an alcoholic.
That "probably" is key. Leon Edel, biographer of Henry James,
defined a biographer as "a novelist, on oath". It's a valid aphorism
and worth bearing in mind, particularly when dealing with a writer as famous
and as shrouded with legend and anecdote as Dickens. One of the reasons why
it's so intriguing to learn how much money he made is that it strips away some
mythic veils – Dickens was a great artist, but he was also a very human being.
Tomalin's biography – always scrupulous about what we can know, what we can
deduce and what is mere speculation – paints a portrait of a complex and
exacting man. He was at once vivacious and charming, charismatic and altruistic
and possessed of superabundant energies – "Dickens kept going,"
Tomalin notes, "by taking on too much" (for example, in 1838 he was
writing Oliver Twist and Nicholas Nicklebysimultaneously). But he was also, equally – to an
almost schizoid degree – tormented, imperious, vindictive and implacable, once
wronged.
These matters are particularly focused when it comes to the story of
Dickens's marriage and his long affair with the young actress Nelly Ternan.
Dickens, aged 45, fell for Ellen Ternan when she was 18. It was simply – like
Pip's love for Estella in Great Expectations – because she
was "irresistible", he claimed. Dickens had long been unhappy in his
marriage – a union that had produced 10 children by this time – and his
infatuation with Nelly brought out the worst in him. He publicly separated from
Catherine, humiliating her in the cruellest manner, and, after a form of
courtship with Nelly – who did not yield to his importuning immediately – set
her up as his mistress in a series of houses on the outskirts of London. This
was done in the greatest secrecy, and it's something of a miracle that we know
about this side of Dickens's life at all.
However, by the time he had succeeded in finally establishing this new
menage to his satisfaction, Dickens was ageing and ailing. Perhaps the strain
of living this lie in Victorian England provoked undue stress – we must never
forget how internationally famous he was – but by his early 50s Dickens was
prematurely aged, suffering from terrible gout (he could often hardly walk),
piles, neuralgia and, later, the effects of a minor stroke. George Eliot
described him in 1870 as "dreadfully shattered". He had been an
enthusiastic cigar smoker since the age of 15 and the late photographs show a
raddled, smoker's face with grizzled beard and deep lines. Probably the worst
thing he could do as his health gave way was to embark on a punishing series of
tours giving public readings from his novels. He was so weak he sometimes had
to be helped on and off the stage, but he fed off the adoration of the
thousands of his readers who turned out to hear him at home and in America.
Yet, while the relentless schedule may have hastened his death, it was also a
great succour to his ego and his bank balance – "Think of it," he
once said gleefully to his manager, "£190 a night [£14,000]." He died
in 1870 from a cerebral haemorrhage, aged 58, with his last novel, The Mystery of Edwin Drood, unfinished.
The work remains and endures – and Tomalin analyses the novels with
great acuity – but what is so valuable about this biography is the palpable
sense of the man himself that emerges. Tomalin doesn't hesitate to condemn
Dickens when his behaviour demands it, yet she writes throughout with great
sympathy and unrivalled knowledge in the most limpid and stylish prose. She has
the gift of being able to set a scene and a time with compelling vividness.
This is a superb biography of a great writer – and is a beautifully produced
book, it should be said, with copious illustrations. It is worthy to stand
beside Richard Ellmann on Joyce, Donald Rayfield on Chekhov and Jean-Yves Tadie
on Proust – all three writers who deserve that rarest of accolades, genius.
Like Dickens, they were complicated and often extremely difficult and demanding
individuals. The more we learn about them as people – paradoxically – the greater
their art resonates with us.
No comments:
Post a Comment