Arms
and the Man is one of the finest anti-romantic comedies on the theme of love
and war which comes from the pen of Bernard Shaw, who refused, on the one hand,
to believes that soldier are exceptionally heroic and inspired by patriot
sentiments. On the other hand, he thought of marriage not as a means of
satisfying the personal desire of individual men and women. Thus, as we see
these two themes are quite distinct from each other but Shaw has developed his
plot in such a way that they are interwoven. Here Shaw’s object is to expose
the romantic notion of war with love and marriage.
The play opens with Raina with her romantic notion
about her finace, Major Sergius who led a successful cavalry charge against
Serbians. She adores his photograph and goes to bed murmuring “my hero, my
hero”. Soon afterwards, her view breaks upon her by a run away soldier, Captain
Bluntschli, a Swiss by birth and participate in wars as a soldier. Bluntschli
torn the mask of her romance that she worn since childhood. Bluntschli’s
personality makes such an impression on Raina’s mind that she instantly falls
in love with him. As a token of love, she puts self signed photograph in the
pocket of the coat pf her father that she offered to Bluntschli to make a safe
escape and calls her “my chocolate cream soldier”.
According
to Shaw, fighting is as much as a profession as another activity. Life, not
death, is the object of a soldier at the battlefields that is why Captain
Bluntschli runs away from the battlefield. Shaw believes that it is only young
soldier without any experience of warfare that risk their lives rashly like Don
Quixote, whereas, experienced soldier have neither sentiment nor enthusiasm and
can live as long as they can. First, Captain Bluntschli is more then a carrier
of Shaw’s attack of romanticism in war and sentimentalism in love. After it, a
soldier who participates in war just for the sake of money. And finally,
through Major Sergius, soldier lover, Shaw exposed the militarism.
Major
Sergius is not only a false hero of love but also unstable in war. He confesses
before Catherine, after returning victorious from the
battlefield: “Soldiering, my dear madam, is coward’s art of attacking
mercilessly when you are strong”. He goes on saying:
“This
is the whole secret of the fighting. Find your enemy at disadvantage,
and never, On any account, fight him on equal terms”.
and never, On any account, fight him on equal terms”.
Like
war, love has no romance in Shaw’s eye. Raina’s feeling about war undergoes a
cataclysmic change when Bluntschli tells her the truth about the successful
cavalry charge. Sergius himself comes back as a changed man. He thought higher
love quite unrealistic. Talking to Louka, whom he found more satisfying in sex,
about “higher love” he says, is:
“very
fatiguing thinking to keep for any length, Louka.
One feels the need of some relief after it”.
One feels the need of some relief after it”.
Thus,
we see that Arms and the Man is a pleasant anti romantic with the amusing
exposure of the glory of the war and romantic love.
In
this play Shaw has torn the mask of sentimentalism surrounding love and war.
While the Roman poet, Virgil, in his Aeneid sings and celebrates the glory of
arms and the man, where both are praised for their heroic extolled, but Shaw
makes the ironic use of both and satirizing the each elements. Shaw believes
that man is an animal of social instinct which is of greater importance than
“Arms”. So the supremacy not arms or heroic but essential humanity that is
asserted. Due to which Captain Bluntschli runs away from the battlefield and
instead of cartridges he carries chocolates to the front to show that man is
not heroic but a creature of blood and flesh whom T.S. Eliot called “A handful
of dust”.
One
would agree with William Irvine that Shaw’s attitude toward war was profoundly
affected by Ibsenite opposition of romantic and reality, ideal and real. But
“what he objects to” as Chesterton says very well “is not so much war as
the romantic attractiveness of war”.
Thus,
the nacked realism of human life is framed into the powerful frame of didactism
where the note of war and reality of love makes such an impression which makes
Shaw murmuring like Tolstoy:
“There
shell be no war if you must, For god sake no war songs”
This
is what G.K. Chesterton means:
“The
world should not encourage a rational lover because
he would never get married and world should not encourage
a rational soldier because he would run away”.
he would never get married and world should not encourage
a rational soldier because he would run away”.
Like
Tolstoy, Shaw believes that romantic is only butchery and romantic love is only
lust.
No comments:
Post a Comment